Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, December 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source

twitter: 4 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 38 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 4 X users, with an upper bound of 3,670 followers.

RT @CRMjournal: Recently accepted: Culprit vessel only vs #multivessel #percutaneouscoronaryintervention in #acutemyocardialinfarction with…

RT @CRMjournal: Recently accepted: Culprit vessel only vs #multivessel #percutaneouscoronaryintervention in #acutemyocardialinfarction with…

RT @CRMjournal: Recently accepted: Culprit vessel only vs #multivessel #percutaneouscoronaryintervention in #acutemyocardialinfarction with…

Recently accepted: Culprit vessel only vs #multivessel #percutaneouscoronaryintervention in #acutemyocardialinfarction with #cardiogenicshock: A #systematicreview and #metaanalysis by @faisalkhalid153 ... @BagaiJayant ... @DrMauricioCohen ... @timir_pau…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity.

Login to access the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.