You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The comparative genomics and complex population history of Papio baboons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aau6947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey Rogers, Muthuswamy Raveendran, R. Alan Harris, Thomas Mailund, Kalle Leppälä, Georgios Athanasiadis, Mikkel Heide Schierup, Jade Cheng, Kasper Munch, Jerilyn A. Walker, Miriam K. Konkel, Vallmer Jordan, Cody J. Steely, Thomas O. Beckstrom, Christina Bergey, Andrew Burrell, Dominik Schrempf, Angela Noll, Maximillian Kothe, Gisela H. Kopp, Yue Liu, Shwetha Murali, Konstantinos Billis, Fergal J. Martin, Matthieu Muffato, Laura Cox, James Else, Todd Disotell, Donna M. Muzny, Jane Phillips-Conroy, Bronwen Aken, Evan E. Eichler, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Carolin Kosiol, Mark A. Batzer, Matthew W. Hahn, Jenny Tung, Dietmar Zinner, Christian Roos, Clifford J. Jolly, Richard A. Gibbs, Kim C. Worley, Baboon Genome Analysis Consortium |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 186 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 21% |
| Spain | 16 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 8% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Portugal | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 58% |
| Scientists | 76 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Professor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 67 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2026.
All research outputs
#264,228
of 34,601,984 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#2,243
of 19,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,714
of 488,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#38
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.