↓ Skip to main content

Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation
Published in
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, January 2019
DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Master 19 10%
Professor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 46%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 63 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#9,844,755
of 32,202,065 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
#308
of 404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,076
of 473,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,202,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.