↓ Skip to main content

Patient-Oriented Cancer Information on the Internet: A Comparison of Wikipedia and a Professionally Maintained Database

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oncology Practice, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
reddit
9 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient-Oriented Cancer Information on the Internet: A Comparison of Wikipedia and a Professionally Maintained Database
Published in
Journal of Oncology Practice, August 2011
DOI 10.1200/jop.2010.000209
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A wiki is a collaborative Web site, such as Wikipedia, that can be freely edited. Because of a wiki's lack of formal editorial control, we hypothesized that the content would be less complete and accurate than that of a professional peer-reviewed Web site. In this study, the coverage, accuracy, and readability of cancer information on Wikipedia were compared with those of the patient-orientated National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query (PDQ) comprehensive cancer database.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
New Zealand 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 56 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 8 12%
Researcher 8 12%
Librarian 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 20 30%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Computer Science 10 15%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2026.
All research outputs
#768,157
of 32,734,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oncology Practice
#65
of 1,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,631
of 158,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oncology Practice
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,734,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.