↓ Skip to main content

Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Overview of attention for article published in Family Practice, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?
Published in
Family Practice, October 2003
DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmg509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 260 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 22%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 67 24%
Unknown 33 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 37%
Social Sciences 25 9%
Psychology 25 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 43 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,805,895
of 27,057,185 outputs
Outputs from Family Practice
#634
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,201
of 60,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Family Practice
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,057,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.