↓ Skip to main content

「秦の始皇帝」と「漢の高祖劉邦」

Overview of attention for article published in Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU), July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「秦の始皇帝」と「漢の高祖劉邦」
Published in
Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU), July 2018
DOI 10.24712/keizaishikenkyu.20.0_1
Authors

齋藤 道子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU)
#22
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,222
of 341,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Study of Economic History (KEIZAISHI KENKYU)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them