↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study of the Use of Biocide-Impregnated Gauze as an Adjunct to Wound Care in a Burn Population

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of burn care & research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Pilot Study of the Use of Biocide-Impregnated Gauze as an Adjunct to Wound Care in a Burn Population
Published in
Journal of burn care & research, January 2012
DOI 10.1097/bcr.0b013e31823746d2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a polyhexamethylene biguanide biocide-impregnated gauze (Kerlix™ AMD gauze dressing, Covidien d/b/a Tyco Healthcare Group LP) as an adjuvant to routine burn care and its impact on the incidence of hospital-associated infections in burn population. One hundred eight burn patients admitted to the Burn Treatment Center were prospectively enrolled from August 2008 to June 2009 and matched 1:2 with historic controls who were admitted from March 2006 to July 2008. Clinical care remained otherwise unchanged; however, several hospital initiatives (the national surgical improvement project, the surgical care improvement project, and a central venous line bundle) were initiated before and during the study. There were significantly less infections in the study population (18.52% of case patients vs 28.70% of control patients had infections, P = .047). Although there was a decrease in each infection subtype analyzed, a statistically significant reduction was only reached for pneumonias (1.85% in cases vs 5.86 in controls, P = .042). Implementation of polyhexamethylene biguanide biocide-impregnated gauze was temporally correlated with a significant decrease in healthcare-associated infections in burn population. As there was no corresponding decrease in wound infections, the impact of the gauze on healthcare-associated infections, if any, cannot be conclusively determined by this study. A larger prospective study powered to detect a decrease in wound-related infections is warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2013.
All research outputs
#27,870,620
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of burn care & research
#1,334
of 2,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,308
of 305,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of burn care & research
#73
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.