You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
全個体遺伝子型解析データに基づく絶滅危惧水生植物シモツケコウホネNuphar submersaとナガレコウホネN.×fluminalisの市場流通株の種同定と産地特定
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.18.1_33 |
| Authors |
志賀 隆, 横川 昌史, 兼子 伸吾, 井鷺 裕司 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 18 | 32% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,047,947
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#15
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,715
of 205,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them