↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic investigation of skin sloughing rates in frogs: relationships with skin characteristics and disease-driven declines

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phylogenetic investigation of skin sloughing rates in frogs: relationships with skin characteristics and disease-driven declines
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2019
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.2378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2025.
All research outputs
#1,933,266
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,723
of 12,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,203
of 486,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#65
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.