↓ Skip to main content

High Frequencies of De Novo CNVs in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High Frequencies of De Novo CNVs in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia
Published in
Neuron, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While it is known that rare copy-number variants (CNVs) contribute to risk for some neuropsychiatric disorders, the role of CNVs in bipolar disorder is unclear. Here, we reasoned that a contribution of CNVs to mood disorders might be most evident for de novo mutations. We performed a genome-wide analysis of de novo CNVs in a cohort of 788 trios. Diagnoses of offspring included bipolar disorder (n = 185), schizophrenia (n = 177), and healthy controls (n = 426). Frequencies of de novo CNVs were significantly higher in bipolar disorder as compared with controls (OR = 4.8 [1.4,16.0], p = 0.009). De novo CNVs were particularly enriched among cases with an age at onset younger than 18 (OR = 6.3 [1.7,22.6], p = 0.006). We also confirmed a significant enrichment of de novo CNVs in schizophrenia (OR = 5.0 [1.5,16.8], p = 0.007). Our results suggest that rare spontaneous mutations are an important contributor to risk for bipolar disorder and other major neuropsychiatric diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 318 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 19%
Researcher 63 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Master 31 9%
Professor 23 7%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 61 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 11%
Neuroscience 35 10%
Psychology 29 9%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 75 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#9,256,193
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#6,873
of 10,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,194
of 300,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#46
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.