↓ Skip to main content

Sulfur in the South Florida Ecosystem: Distribution, Sources, Biogeochemistry, Impacts, and Management for Restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sulfur in the South Florida Ecosystem: Distribution, Sources, Biogeochemistry, Impacts, and Management for Restoration
Published in
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, February 2011
DOI 10.1080/10643389.2010.531201
Authors

William Orem, Cynthia Gilmour, Donald Axelrad, David Krabbenhoft, Daniel Scheidt, Peter Kalla, Paul McCormick, Mark Gabriel, George Aiken

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Engineering 7 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,648,703
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#236
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,956
of 119,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.