↓ Skip to main content

White Matter Changes in Tinnitus: Is It All Age and Hearing Loss?

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Connectivity, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
White Matter Changes in Tinnitus: Is It All Age and Hearing Loss?
Published in
Brain Connectivity, February 2016
DOI 10.1089/brain.2015.0380
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tinnitus is a condition characterized by the perception of auditory phantom sounds. It is known as the result of complex interactions between auditory and non-auditory regions. However, previous structural imaging studies on tinnitus patients showed evidence of significant white matter changes caused by hearing loss that is positively correlated with aging. Current study focused on which aspects of tinnitus pathologies affect the white matter integrity the most. We used diffusion tensor imaging technique to acquire images that have higher contrast in brain white matter, in order to analyze how white matter is influenced by tinnitus-related factors using voxel-based methods, region of interest analysis and deterministic tractography. As a result, white matter integrity in chronic tinnitus patients was both directly affected by age and also mediated by the hearing loss. The most important changes in white matter regions were found bilaterally in the anterior corona radiata, anterior corpus callosum, and bilateral sagittal strata. In the tractography analysis, the white matter integrity values in tracts of right parahippocampus were correlated with the subjective tinnitus loudness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Neuroscience 8 26%
Psychology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#27,095,135
of 32,787,243 outputs
Outputs from Brain Connectivity
#390
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,997
of 441,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Connectivity
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,787,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.