↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy targeting retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy targeting retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-3933-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of superselective intra-arterial infusion of high-dose cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy (hereafter RADPLAT) for head and neck squamous cell cancer (hereafter HNSCC) patients with retropharyngeal lymph node (hereafter RPLN) metastasis. A retrospective case series review was conducted at University medical center in Japan. Ten HNSCC patients with RPLN metastasis treated by RADPLAT were analyzed. The ascending pharyngeal artery was targeted for the treatment of RPLN metastasis in 9 patients. The median total dose of cisplatin was 26.6 mg/m(2) (mean 31.5 mg/m(2), range 11.7-87.9 mg/m(2)). In the remaining patient, the RPLN was supplied by the ascending palatine artery. As grade 3 and 4 adverse effects, leukopenia was observed in three, mucositis in four and nausea in one patient. No neurological complications were observed in any patients. Metastatic RPLNs were evaluated as a complete response in all patients. There was no recurrence of RPLN metastasis in any patients. Four patients remain alive without any evidence of disease and six patients died of disease. The 5-year overall survival rate was 50 %. We have shown that superselective intra-arterial cisplatin infusion for RPLNs was a feasible and effective approach for HNSCC patients with RPLN metastasis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,306,690
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2,027
of 3,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,485
of 400,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#40
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.