You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ICARUS, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0019-1035(02)00036-2 |
| Authors |
Lisa R Gaddis, Matthew I Staid, James A Tyburczy, B.Ray Hawke, Noah E Petro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 45% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 23 | 24% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Energy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#2,542
of 5,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,350
of 141,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.