↓ Skip to main content

Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Cell Signaling Regulates the Mosquito Immune Response to Plasmodium falciparum

Overview of attention for article published in Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Cell Signaling Regulates the Mosquito Immune Response to Plasmodium falciparum
Published in
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, March 2011
DOI 10.1089/ars.2010.3401
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in direct killing of pathogens, increased tissue damage, and regulation of immune signaling pathways in mammalian cells. Available research suggests that analogous phenomena affect the establishment of Plasmodium infection in Anopheles mosquitoes. We have previously shown that provision of human insulin in a blood meal leads to increased ROS levels in Anopheles stephensi. Here, we demonstrate that provision of human insulin significantly increased parasite development in the same mosquito host in a manner that was not consistent with ROS-induced parasite killing or parasite escape through damaged tissue. Rather, our studies demonstrate that ROS are important mediators of both the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling branches of the mosquito insulin signaling cascade. Further, ROS alone can directly activate these signaling pathways and this activation is growth factor specific. Our data, therefore, highlight a novel role for ROS as signaling mediators in the mosquito innate immune response to Plasmodium parasites.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Thailand 1 1%
Senegal 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 71 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2012.
All research outputs
#22,893,765
of 32,151,140 outputs
Outputs from Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
#1,637
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,899
of 148,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
#56
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,151,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.