↓ Skip to main content

Zoonotic Viruses Associated with Illegally Imported Wildlife Products

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
48 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zoonotic Viruses Associated with Illegally Imported Wildlife Products
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029505
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristine M. Smith, Simon J. Anthony, William M. Switzer, Jonathan H. Epstein, Tracie Seimon, Hongwei Jia, Maria D. Sanchez, Thanh Thao Huynh, G. Gale Galland, Sheryl E. Shapiro, Jonathan M. Sleeman, Denise McAloose, Margot Stuchin, George Amato, Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, W. Ian Lipkin, William B. Karesh, Peter Daszak, Nina Marano

Abstract

The global trade in wildlife has historically contributed to the emergence and spread of infectious diseases. The United States is the world's largest importer of wildlife and wildlife products, yet minimal pathogen surveillance has precluded assessment of the health risks posed by this practice. This report details the findings of a pilot project to establish surveillance methodology for zoonotic agents in confiscated wildlife products. Initial findings from samples collected at several international airports identified parts originating from nonhuman primate (NHP) and rodent species, including baboon, chimpanzee, mangabey, guenon, green monkey, cane rat and rat. Pathogen screening identified retroviruses (simian foamy virus) and/or herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus and lymphocryptovirus) in the NHP samples. These results are the first demonstration that illegal bushmeat importation into the United States could act as a conduit for pathogen spread, and suggest that implementation of disease surveillance of the wildlife trade will help facilitate prevention of disease emergence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Kenya 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 347 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 16%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Other 23 6%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 47 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 147 40%
Environmental Science 44 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 30 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 53 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#175,073
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,615
of 221,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#775
of 248,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#23
of 3,218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.