↓ Skip to main content

Effects of smoking cannabis on lung function

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 968)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
21 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of smoking cannabis on lung function
Published in
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1586/ers.11.40
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although cannabis (or marijuana) is the world's most widely-used illicit drug, there has been surprisingly little research into its effects on respiratory health. Part of the problem is the inherent difficulty of studying the long-term effects of an illegal habit. It has often been assumed that smoking cannabis will have similar long-term effects to smoking tobacco. Several recent observational studies suggest that this is not the case and that cannabis has quite different effects on the lung function. There are consistent findings that smoking cannabis is associated with large airway inflammation, symptoms of bronchitis, increased airway resistance and lung hyperinflation. The evidence that smoking cannabis leads to features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, such as airflow obstruction and emphysema is not convincing. However, there are numerous case reports of bullous emphysema among cannabis smokers. These findings have not been confirmed in systematic analytical studies and probably represent uncommon adverse effects in very heavy cannabis smokers. There is now additional controversial evidence that cannabis is at least an occasional cause of respiratory malignancies, but again the evidence is inconclusive.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 46 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2024.
All research outputs
#327,533
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
#8
of 968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,624
of 370,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
#2
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.