↓ Skip to main content

予防歯科学・口腔衛生学およびフッ化物応用に関する教育の29大学間の差異と教育時間の減少 : 予防歯科学・口腔衛生学教育の現状調査2011

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF DENTAL HEALTH, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
予防歯科学・口腔衛生学およびフッ化物応用に関する教育の29大学間の差異と教育時間の減少 : 予防歯科学・口腔衛生学教育の現状調査2011
Published in
JOURNAL OF DENTAL HEALTH, July 2015
DOI 10.5834/jdh.65.4_362
Authors

相田 潤, 田浦 勝彦, 荒川 浩久, 小林 清吾, 飯島 洋一, 磯崎 篤則, 井下 英二, 八木 稔, 眞木 吉信

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF DENTAL HEALTH
#68
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,818
of 277,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF DENTAL HEALTH
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them