↓ Skip to main content

p53 Has a Direct Apoptogenic Role at the Mitochondria

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
551 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
p53 Has a Direct Apoptogenic Role at the Mitochondria
Published in
Molecular Cell, March 2003
DOI 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00050-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

p53 induces apoptosis by target gene regulation and transcription-independent signaling. However, a mechanism for the latter was unknown. We recently reported that a fraction of induced p53 translocates to the mitochondria of apoptosing tumor cells. Targeting p53 to mitochondria is sufficient to launch apoptosis. Here, we provide evidence that p53 translocation to the mitochondria occurs in vivo in irradiated thymocytes. Further, we show that the p53 protein can directly induce permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane by forming complexes with the protective BclXL and Bcl2 proteins, resulting in cytochrome c release. p53 binds to BclXL via its DNA binding domain. We probe the significance of mitochondrial p53 and show that tumor-derived transactivation-deficient mutants of p53 concomitantly lose the ability to interact with BclXL and promote cytochrome c release. This opens the possibility that mutations might represent "double-hits" by abrogating the transcriptional and mitochondrial apoptotic activity of p53.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 551 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 532 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 25%
Researcher 84 15%
Student > Bachelor 62 11%
Student > Master 61 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 108 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 188 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 130 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 8%
Chemistry 21 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 118 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,215,144
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#3,585
of 8,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,296
of 69,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#12
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.