↓ Skip to main content

Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Physiologic Assessment using Echocardiography for Management and Optimization

Overview of attention for article published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Physiologic Assessment using Echocardiography for Management and Optimization
Published in
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.11.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are being deployed increasingly in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and medically refractory congestive heart failure of any etiology. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the use of the Thoratec Heartmate II (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) for outpatient use. Echocardiography is fundamental during each stage of patient management, pre-LVAD placement, during LVAD placement, for postoperative LVAD optimization and long-term follow-up. We present a pragmatic and systematic echocardiographic approach that serves as a guide for the management of left ventricular assist devices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Sudan 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
#2,332
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,203
of 253,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.