↓ Skip to main content

Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018466108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 4 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 411 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 79 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 17%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Master 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 82 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 21%
Neuroscience 74 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 13%
Psychology 50 12%
Engineering 15 3%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 106 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#691,178
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10,858
of 119,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,145
of 161,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#45
of 800 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 800 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.