↓ Skip to main content

The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
62 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30685-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

GBD 2017 Typhoid and Paratyphoid Collaborators, Jeffrey D Stanaway, Robert C Reiner, Brigette F. Blacker, Ellen M Goldberg, Ibrahim A. Khalil, Christopher E Troeger, Jason R Andrews, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, John A Crump, Justin Im, Florian Marks, Eric Mintz, Eun Park, Anita K M Zaidi, Zegeye Abebe, Ayenew Negesse Abejie, Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji, Beriwan Abdulqadir Ali, Azmeraw T. Amare, Hagos Tasew Atalay, Euripide F G A Avokpaho, Umar Bacha, Aleksandra Barac, Neeraj Bedi, Adugnaw Berhane, Annie J Browne, Jesus L. Chirinos, Abdulaal Chitheer, Christiane Dolecek, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki, Babak Eshrati, Kyle J. Foreman, Abdella Gemechu, Rahul Gupta, Gessessew Bugssa Hailu, Andualem Henok, Desalegn Tsegaw Hibstu, Chi Linh Hoang, Olayinka Stephen Ilesanmi, Veena J Iyer, Amaha Kahsay, Amir Kasaeian, Tesfaye Dessale Kassa, Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Young-Ho Khang, Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek, Mulugeta Melku, Desalegn Tadese Mengistu, Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad, Shafiu Mohammed, Ali H Mokdad, Jean B Nachega, Aliya Naheed, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi Nguyen, Long Hoang Nguyen, Nam Ba Nguyen, Trang Huyen Nguyen, Yirga Legesse Nirayo, Tikki Pangestu, George C Patton, Mostafa Qorbani, Rajesh Kumar, Saleem M Rana, Chhabi Lal Ranabhat, Kedir Teji Roba, Nicholas L S Roberts, Salvatore Rubino, Saeid Safiri, Benn Sartorius, Monika Sawhney, Mekonnen Sisay Shiferaw, David L Smith, Bryan L. Sykes, Bach Xuan Tran, Tung Thanh Tran, Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja, Giang Thu Vu, Linh Gia Vu, Fitsum Weldegebreal, Melaku Kindie Yenit, Christopher J L Murray, Simon I. Hay

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 117 9%
Student > Bachelor 103 8%
Researcher 96 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 7%
Student > Postgraduate 64 5%
Other 164 13%
Unknown 631 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 93 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 71 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 4%
Other 132 10%
Unknown 668 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#488,853
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#836
of 7,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,745
of 393,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#13
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.