↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and safety of lumbar puncture in the Parkinson's disease research participants: Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI)

Overview of attention for article published in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Feasibility and safety of lumbar puncture in the Parkinson's disease research participants: Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI)
Published in
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, January 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.12.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neha Prakash, Chelsea Caspell-Garcia, Christopher Coffey, Andrew Siderowf, Caroline M. Tanner, Karl Kieburtz, Brit Mollenhauer, Douglas Galasko, Kalpana Merchant, Tatiana Foroud, Lana M. Chahine, Daniel Weintraub, Cindy Casaceli, Ray Dorsey, Renee Wilson, Margaret Herzog, Nichole Daegele, Vanessa Arnedo, Mark Frasier, Todd Sherer, Ken Marek, Samuel Frank, Danna Jennings, Tanya Simuni, Kenneth Marek, Andrew Siderowf, John Seibyl, Christopher Coffey, Caroline Tanner, Duygu Tosun-Turgut, Tanya Simuni, Leslie Shaw, John Trojanowski, Andrew Singleton, Karl Kieburtz, Arthur Toga, Brit Mollenhauer, Douglas Galasko, Werner Poewe, Tatiana Foroud, Kathleen Poston, Todd Sherer, Sohini Chowdhury, Mark Frasier, Catherine Kopil, Vanessa Arnedo, Kenneth Marek, Nichole Daegele, Cynthia Casaceli, Ray Dorsey, Renee Wilson, Sugi Mahes, John Seibyl, Christina Salerno, Christopher Coffey, Chelsea Caspell-Garcia, Arthur Toga, Karen Crawford, Tatiana Foroud, Paola Casalin, Giulia Malferrari, Mali Gani Weisz, Avi Orr-Urtreger, John Trojanowski, Leslie Shaw, Andrew Singleton, Tatiana Foroud, Tatiana Foroud, Thomas Montine, Tatiana Foroud, David Russell, Caroline Tanner, Tanya Simuni, Nabila Dahodwala, Brit Mollenhauer, Douglas Galasko, Werner Poewe, Nir Giladi, Stewart Factor, Penelope Hogarth, David Standaert, Robert Hauser, Joseph Jankovic, Marie Saint-Hilaire, Irene Richard, David Shprecher, Hubert Fernandez, Katrina Brockmann, Liana Rosenthal, Paolo Barone, Alberto Espay, Dominic Rowe, Karen Marder, Anthony Santiago, Susan Bressman, Shu-Ching Hu, Stuart Isaacson, Jean-Christophe Corvol, Javiar Ruiz Martinez, Eduardo Tolosa, Yen Tai, Marios Politis, Debra Smejdir, Linda Rees, Karen Williams, Farah Kausar, Karen Williams, Whitney Richardson, Diana Willeke, Shawnees Peacock, Beatrice Heim, Anat Mirelman, Barbara Sommerfeld, Alison Freed, Katrina Wakeman, Courtney Blair, Stephanie Guthrie, Leigh Harrell, Christine Hunter, Cathi-Ann Thomas, Raymond James, Grace Zimmerman, Victoria Brown, Jennifer Mule, Ella Hilt, Kori Ribb, Susan Ainscough, Misty Wethington, Madelaine Ranola, Helen Mejia Santana, Juliana Moreno, Deborah Raymond, Krista Speketer, Lisbeth Carvajal, Stephanie Carvalho, Ioana Croitoru, Alicia Garrido, Laura Marie Payne, Veena Viswanth, Lawrence Severt, Maurizio Facheris, Holly Soares, Mark A. Mintun, Jesse Cedarbaum, Peggy Taylor, Kevin Biglan, Emily Vandenbroucke, Zulfiqar Haider Sheikh, Baris Bingol, Tanya Fischer, Pablo Sardi, Remi Forrat, Alastair Reith, Jan Egebjerg, Gabrielle Ahlberg Hillert, Barbara Saba, Chris Min, Robert Umek, Joe Mather, Susan De Santi, Anke Post, Frank Boess, Kirsten Taylor, Igor Grachev, Andreja Avbersek, Pierandrea Muglia, Kaplana Merchant, Johannes Tauscher

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 35 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 19%
Neuroscience 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 40 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#19,924,915
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#2,372
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,385
of 446,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#50
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.