↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human Apolipoprotein E2, E3, and E4 Isoform-Specific Transgenic Mice: Human-like Pattern of GlialandNeuronal Immunoreactivity in Central Nervous System Not Observed in Wild-Type Mice
Published in
Neurobiology of Disease, June 1996
DOI 10.1006/nbdi.1996.0023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) and its three major alleles (APOE2, E3, and E4) have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease and other neurological disorders. Little is known of the role apoE plays in normal brain function and pathology. To create a model to study apoE in brain, we have generated APOE transgenic mice using microinjection of allele-specific human genomic fragments to establish founders which were then bred to APOE knockout mice lacking a functional mouse apoE protein. This allows the study of apoE without interference from the endogenous mouse APOE gene. Results demonstrate that transgenic lines have been established that transcribe and express apoE appropriately in brain, liver, and other tissues. High cholesterol levels found in APOE knockout mice are substantially corrected in the APOE transgenic lines. ApoE immunoreactivity has been detected in glial cells and selected classes of neurons in all three isoform-specific transgenics. This pattern of immunoreactivity is similar to that observed in nonhuman primates and man, and contrasts with the strictly glial staining pattern of normal rodents.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 7 13%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2001.
All research outputs
#6,086,043
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Disease
#1,423
of 3,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,703
of 30,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Disease
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.