You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Refined thorium abundances for lunar red spots: Implications for evolved, nonmare volcanism on the Moon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2005je002592 |
| Authors |
J. J. Hagerty, D. J. Lawrence, B. R. Hawke, D. T. Vaniman, R. C. Elphic, W. C. Feldman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 37 | 63% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#11,280
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,258
of 88,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#104
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.