↓ Skip to main content

Human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator directed to respiratory epithelial cells of transgenic mice

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator directed to respiratory epithelial cells of transgenic mice
Published in
Nature Genetics, September 1992
DOI 10.1038/ng0992-13
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) was expressed in transgenic mice under the control of transcriptional elements derived from the human surfactant protein C (SP-C) gene. The hCFTR mRNA was expressed in lungs and testes: in the lung, we found hCFTR mRNA in bronchiolar and alveolar epithelial cells, and CFTR protein in respiratory epithelial cells. While the level of expression of hCFTR mRNA varied, hCFTR mRNA and protein were detected in pulmonary epithelial cells of several lines. Lung weight, morphology, somatic growth and reproductive capacity were not altered by expression hCFTR in lung and testes of the transgenics. Our findings suggest that hCFTR can be safely transferred to lung epithelial cells for CF therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 13%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2001.
All research outputs
#6,276,229
of 28,794,301 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#5,085
of 8,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,072
of 20,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,794,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.