↓ Skip to main content

iRhom2 Regulation of TACE Controls TNF-Mediated Protection Against Listeria and Responses to LPS

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
iRhom2 Regulation of TACE Controls TNF-Mediated Protection Against Listeria and Responses to LPS
Published in
Science, January 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1214448
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Innate immune responses are vital for pathogen defense but can result in septic shock when excessive. A key mediator of septic shock is tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), which is shed from the plasma membrane after cleavage by the TNFα convertase (TACE). We report that the rhomboid family member iRhom2 interacted with TACE and regulated TNFα shedding. iRhom2 was critical for TACE maturation and trafficking to the cell surface in hematopoietic cells. Gene-targeted iRhom2-deficient mice showed reduced serum TNFα in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and could survive a lethal LPS dose. Furthermore, iRhom2-deficient mice failed to control the replication of Listeria monocytogenes. Our study has identified iRhom2 as a regulator of innate immunity that may be an important target for modulating sepsis and pathogen defense.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United States 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 224 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 21%
Researcher 45 19%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 47 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,247,465
of 33,957,889 outputs
Outputs from Science
#30,111
of 93,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,087
of 302,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#218
of 737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,957,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.