↓ Skip to main content

Workplace Triple P: A Controlled Evaluation of a Parenting Intervention for Working Parents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family Psychology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Workplace Triple P: A Controlled Evaluation of a Parenting Intervention for Working Parents
Published in
Journal of Family Psychology, August 2011
DOI 10.1037/a0024148
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper examined the effects of a parenting intervention targeting working parents called Workplace Triple P. The intervention targeted both parenting and work factors, focusing on key transition times (e.g., from home to work) and trained parents to more effectively manage these transitions. One-hundred-and-twenty-one working parents with children ranging in age from 1-16 years were randomly assigned to either a Workplace Triple P condition (WPTP) or to a waitlist control condition (WLC). Results showed that parents who had received the intervention reported significantly lower levels on measures of personal distress and dysfunctional parenting; and higher levels of work commitment, work satisfaction, and self-efficacy. Implications for the delivery of parenting interventions as employee assistance programs are discussed along with how such interventions can enhance work and family life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 45%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,047,954
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family Psychology
#590
of 1,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,994
of 130,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family Psychology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.