↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
GC-MS Metabolite Profiling of Extreme Southern Pinot noir Wines: Effects of Vintage, Barrel Maturation, and Fermentation Dominate over Vineyard Site and Clone Selection
Published in
Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, March 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05861
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Wine is an extremely complex beverage that contains a multitude of volatile and non-volatile compounds. This study investiged the effect of vineyard site and grapevine clone on the volatile profiles of commercially produced Pinot Noir wines from Central Otago, New Zealand. Volatile metabolites in Pinot Noir wines produced from five grapevine clones grown on six vineyard sites in close proximity, over two consecutive vintages were surveyed using gas-chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The raw GC-MS data was processed using parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC2) and final metabolite data was analysed by principal component analysis (PCA). Winemaking conditions, vintage and barrel maturation were found to be the most dominant factors. The effects of vineyard site and clone were mostly vintage dependent. Although four compounds including β-citronellol, homovanillyl alcohol, N(3-methylbutyl)acetamide and N(2-phenylethyl) acetamide discriminated the vineyard sites independant of vintage, Pinot Noir wines from different clones were only partially discriminated by PCA and marker compound selection remained challenging.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 27%
Chemistry 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#9,222,477
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#9,185
of 25,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,386
of 337,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#51
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.