↓ Skip to main content

To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Endangered Species Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
8 policy sources
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries
Published in
Endangered Species Research, January 2013
DOI 10.3354/esr00464
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 312 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 51 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Other 20 6%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 92 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 44%
Environmental Science 56 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 96 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,581,365
of 32,742,468 outputs
Outputs from Endangered Species Research
#119
of 992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,216
of 330,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endangered Species Research
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,742,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them