↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial cGAS-like enzymes synthesize diverse nucleotide signals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bacterial cGAS-like enzymes synthesize diverse nucleotide signals
Published in
Nature, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-0953-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 306 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 403 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 22%
Researcher 62 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Master 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 106 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 142 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 10%
Chemistry 20 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 118 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2026.
All research outputs
#222,619
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,032
of 117,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,972
of 393,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#241
of 1,039 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,039 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.