↓ Skip to main content

Robot-assisted versus open cystectomy in the RAZOR trial – Authors' reply

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Robot-assisted versus open cystectomy in the RAZOR trial – Authors' reply
Published in
The Lancet, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32848-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dipen J Parekh, Vivek Venkatramani, RAZOR trial authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,194,049
of 32,276,014 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#42,036
of 50,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,635
of 485,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#371
of 412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,276,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.