↓ Skip to main content

Interaction between Tobacco and Alcohol Use and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
905 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
735 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interaction between Tobacco and Alcohol Use and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2009
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia Hashibe, Paul Brennan, Shu-chun Chuang, Stefania Boccia, Xavier Castellsague, Chu Chen, Maria Paula Curado, Luigino Dal Maso, Alexander W. Daudt, Eleonora Fabianova, Leticia Fernandez, Victor Wünsch-Filho, Silvia Franceschi, Richard B. Hayes, Rolando Herrero, Karl Kelsey, Sergio Koifman, Carlo La Vecchia, Philip Lazarus, Fabio Levi, Juan J. Lence, Dana Mates, Elena Matos, Ana Menezes, Michael D. McClean, Joshua Muscat, Jose Eluf-Neto, Andrew F. Olshan, Mark Purdue, Peter Rudnai, Stephen M. Schwartz, Elaine Smith, Erich M. Sturgis, Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Renato Talamini, Qingyi Wei, Deborah M. Winn, Oxana Shangina, Agnieszka Pilarska, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Gilles Ferro, Julien Berthiller, Paolo Boffetta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 735 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 721 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 12%
Student > Bachelor 85 12%
Student > Master 82 11%
Researcher 72 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 8%
Other 150 20%
Unknown 197 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 288 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 4%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Other 70 10%
Unknown 226 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#747,005
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#273
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,450
of 193,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.