↓ Skip to main content

Time Course of Treatment Dropout in Cognitive–Behavioral Therapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Time Course of Treatment Dropout in Cognitive–Behavioral Therapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Published in
Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, January 2016
DOI 10.1037/tra0000062
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A substantial minority of people drop out of cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There has been considerable research investigating who drops out of PTSD treatment; however, the question of when dropout occurs has received far less attention. The purpose of the current study was to examine when individuals drop out of CBT for PTSD. Women participants (N = 321) were randomized to 1 of several PTSD treatment conditions. The conditions included prolonged exposure (PE), cognitive processing therapy (CPT), CPT-cognitive only (CPT-C), and written accounts (WA). Survival analysis was used to examine temporal pattern of treatment dropout. Thirty-nine percent of participants dropped out of treatment, and those who dropped out tended to do so by midtreatment. Moreover, the pattern of treatment dropout was consistent across CBT conditions. Additional research is needed to examine if treatment dropout patterns are consistent across treatment modalities and settings. (PsycINFO Database Record

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Other 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 62 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 66 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,591,076
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy
#409
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,057
of 446,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.