↓ Skip to main content

Getting in Touch with the Clathrin Terminal Domain

Overview of attention for article published in Traffic, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Getting in Touch with the Clathrin Terminal Domain
Published in
Traffic, January 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01321.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The N-terminal domain (TD) of the clathrin heavy chain is folded into a seven-bladed β-propeller that projects inward from the polyhedral outer clathrin coat. As the most membrane-proximal portion of assembled clathrin, the TD is a major protein-protein interaction node. Contact with the TD β-propeller occurs through short peptide sequences typically located within intrinsically disordered segments of coat components that usually are elements of the membrane-apposed, inner 'adaptor' coat layer. A huge variation in TD-binding motifs is known and now four spatially discrete interaction surfaces upon the β-propeller have been delineated. An important operational feature of the TD interaction sites in vivo is functional redundancy. The recent discovery that 'pitstop' chemical inhibitors apparently occupy only one of the four TD interaction surfaces, but potently block clathrin-mediated endocytosis, warrants careful consideration of the underlying molecular basis for this inhibition.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 29%
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 30%
Chemistry 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2012.
All research outputs
#21,847,778
of 26,855,855 outputs
Outputs from Traffic
#1,115
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,893
of 253,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Traffic
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,855,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.