↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter retrospective development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for nosocomial invasive candidiasis in the intensive care setting

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
7 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multicenter retrospective development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for nosocomial invasive candidiasis in the intensive care setting
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10096-007-0270-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 158 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 41 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 41 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,180,108
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#143
of 4,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,312
of 129,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.