↓ Skip to main content

Diversity of locally useful tropical forest wild-plants as a function of species richness and informant culture

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diversity of locally useful tropical forest wild-plants as a function of species richness and informant culture
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0208-8
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
India 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Environmental Science 27 33%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,466,751
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,171
of 2,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,207
of 254,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.