↓ Skip to main content

Sustainable Forest Management and Carbon in Tropical Latin America: The Case for REDD+

Overview of attention for article published in Forests, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sustainable Forest Management and Carbon in Tropical Latin America: The Case for REDD+
Published in
Forests, February 2011
DOI 10.3390/f2010200
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 231 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 18%
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Master 33 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 87 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 19%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 63 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#4,566,591
of 27,759,874 outputs
Outputs from Forests
#415
of 4,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,862
of 206,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forests
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,759,874 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.