↓ Skip to main content

Hypothermia Therapy Neurological and Cardiac Benefits

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hypothermia Therapy Neurological and Cardiac Benefits
Published in
JACC, January 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.077
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Due to its protective effect on the brain and the myocardium, hypothermia therapy (HT) has been extensively studied in cardiac arrest patients with coma as well as in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI). In the setting of cardiac arrest, randomized studies have shown that HT decreases mortality and improves neurological outcomes. Subsequent guidelines have therefore recommended cooling (32°C to 34°C) for 12 to 24 h in unconscious adult patients with spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Observational studies have also confirmed the feasibility of this therapy in clinical practice and support its early application in patients with nonventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest and in post-resuscitation circulatory shock. In patients with acute MI, available clinical evidence does not yet support HT as the standard of care, because no study to date has shown a clear net benefit in such a cohort. After a brief review of the mechanisms of action for HT, we provide a review of the clinical evidence, cooling techniques, and potential adverse effects associated with HT in the setting of post-cardiac arrest patient and acute MI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 139 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 40 27%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2026.
All research outputs
#6,490,972
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#10,889
of 22,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,915
of 304,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#52
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.