↓ Skip to main content

Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscientific Model Development, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
Published in
Geoscientific Model Development, February 2016
DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-479-2016
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
India 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#9,515,669
of 27,787,196 outputs
Outputs from Geoscientific Model Development
#756
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,521
of 415,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscientific Model Development
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,787,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.