↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Salvia miltiorrhiza Hydrophilic Extract on Antioxidant Enzymes in Diabetic Patients with Chronic Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Phytotherapy Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/ptr.3513
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate whether Salvia miltiorrhiza hydrophilic extract (SMHE) has the ability to ameliorate oxidative stress in diabetic patients with chronic heart disease (CHD), 62 patients with CHD were recruited. These patients were assigned randomly into two groups: (1) placebo group receiving hypoglycemic therapy; (2) treatment group receiving hypoglycemic therapy plus SMHE. The biological markers related to oxidative stress were measured to determine the effect of treatment. Thirty patients in the placebo group and 24 patients in the treatment group were followed to completion in this study. Overall, the malondialdehyde (MDA) level at day 30 in the treatment group was significantly lower than in the placebo group. However, no significant difference in the serum antioxidant enzymes activities was observed between the groups. At day 60, the serum glutathione (GSH) level, superoxide dismutase (SOD), Paraoxonase (PONase) and glutathione reductase (GSSG-R) activities increased markedly in the treatment group compared with the placebo group. There was no significant difference in the level of lipid profile between the two groups. This study indicated that SMHE clearly reduced oxidative stress in diabetic patients with CHD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#10,182,370
of 33,493,714 outputs
Outputs from Phytotherapy Research
#1,789
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,723
of 157,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytotherapy Research
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,493,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.