↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating reanalysis-driven CORDEX regional climate models over Australia: model performance and errors

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating reanalysis-driven CORDEX regional climate models over Australia: model performance and errors
Published in
Climate Dynamics, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04672-w
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Other 5 5%
Student > Master 5 5%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 37 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 34%
Environmental Science 13 13%
Engineering 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 42 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,035,034
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,817
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,835
of 353,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#64
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.