↓ Skip to main content

System for Ranking Relative Threats of U.S. Volcanoes

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards Review, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
System for Ranking Relative Threats of U.S. Volcanoes
Published in
Natural Hazards Review, November 2007
DOI 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2007)8:4(112)
Authors

John W. Ewert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 49%
Engineering 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,585,435
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards Review
#117
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,086
of 77,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.