↓ Skip to main content

Teachers and Teaching: Speech Production Accommodations Due to Changes in the Acoustic Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Energy Procedia, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Teachers and Teaching: Speech Production Accommodations Due to Changes in the Acoustic Environment
Published in
Energy Procedia, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.764
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

School teachers have an elevated risk of voice problems due to the vocal demands in the workplace. This manuscript presents the results of three studies investigating teachers' voice use at work. In the first study, 57 teachers were observed for 2 weeks (waking hours) to compare how they used their voice in the school environment and in non-school environments. In a second study, 45 participants performed a short vocal task in two different rooms: a variable acoustic room and an anechoic chamber. Subjects were taken back and forth between the two rooms. Each time they entered the variable acoustics room, the reverberation time and/or the background noise condition had been modified. In this latter study, subjects responded to questions about their vocal comfort and their perception of changes in the acoustic environment. In a third study, 20 untrained vocalists performed a simple vocal task in the following conditions: with and without background babble and with and without transparent plexiglass shields to increase the first reflection. Relationships were examined between [1] the results for the room acoustic parameters; [2] the subjects' perception of the room; and [3] the recorded speech acoustic. Several differences between male and female subjects were found; some of those differences held for each room condition (at school vs. not at school, reverberation level, noise level, and early reflection).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Design 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,308,732
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Energy Procedia
#1,869
of 2,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,455
of 284,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy Procedia
#93
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.