↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Health Care Coverage in Cervical Cancer Screening Follow-Up Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study in Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Contribution of Health Care Coverage in Cervical Cancer Screening Follow-Up Findings From a Cross-Sectional Study in Colombia
Published in
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, October 2010
DOI 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181e8dfb8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the role of health care coverage (HCC) in follow-up of cervical cancer screening (seeking Papanicolaou test results and follow-up when abnormal results were found) among Colombian women. A population-based cross-sectional study of 24,717 women, using the 2005 Colombian Demographic and Health Survey, was conducted. Nearly 4% of women screened did not seek their results. For approximately 17% of the women, there was no follow-up when abnormal results were found. Women in the contributory regime (private insurance) and those in the subsidized regime (public insurance) were more likely to seek Papanicolaou test results than women without HCC, even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (adjusted odds ratio [ORa], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.41 and ORa, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.58, respectively). For follow-up when abnormal results were found, there was no difference between the subsidized regime and no HCC, but women in the contributory regime were more likely to follow-up than women without HCC (ORa, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.86). Seeking Papanicolaou test results is relatively high among Colombian women; however, there are differences according to HCC. Follow-up when abnormal Papanicolaou test results were found was positively associated only with private insurance; follow-up is the same for women without insurance and with public insurance. Exploring strategies to promote follow-up among women and to improve cervical cancer follow-up services for those enrolled in the subsidized regime may increase follow-up rates among Colombian women.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,839,120
of 27,458,792 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#514
of 3,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,434
of 117,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,458,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them