↓ Skip to main content

Variable Dose-Response Relationship between Exercise Training and Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Variable Dose-Response Relationship between Exercise Training and Performance
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, July 2003
DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000074465.13621.37
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to propose a nonlinear model of the effects of training on performance. The new formulation introduced a variable to account for training-related changes in the magnitude and duration of exercise-induced fatigue. Goodness-of-fit of the proposed model was compared with that of earlier models presented in the literature. Models were applied to six previously untrained subjects volunteers over a 15-wk endurance-training program composed of an 8-wk period with three sessions per week and a 4-wk period with five sessions, and the remaining weeks without training. Training sessions were composed of performance trial and intermittent exercise with 5-min work interspersed with 3-min recovery repeated four or five times. Performance was measured three times each week using average power during a 5-min all-out exercise. The training program resulted in 30 +/- 7% improvement in performance. The proposed model exhibited significantly improved fit with actual performance obtained in each subject. Standard error was 6.47 +/- 0.71 W for the proposed model and from 9.20 +/- 2.27 W to 10.31 +/- 1.56 W for earlier models. The model output using model parameters averaged over the six subjects was found to be similar to data published elsewhere obtained in athletes with more intense training. The data obtained allowed us to demonstrate an inverted-U-shape relationship between daily amounts of training and performance. The fit between experimental data and model-derived predictions in similar situations showed the usefulness of the proposed model to predict responses to training with varied regimens.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 258 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 17 6%
Researcher 17 6%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 67 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 147 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 67 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2026.
All research outputs
#11,822,450
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#4,936
of 8,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,680
of 75,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.