↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Competitive Trait Anxiety on Collegiate Powerlifting Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of Competitive Trait Anxiety on Collegiate Powerlifting Performance
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence W. Judge, Leslie J. Urbina, Donald L. Hoover, Bruce W. Craig, Lani M. Judge, Brianna M. Leitzelar, David R. Pearson, Kara A. Holtzclaw, David M. Bellar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between competitive trait anxiety measures and powerlifting (PL) performance. Thirty-six collegiate powerlifters on club teams from three universities were recruited during a competition (Male = 26, Female =10; Age 19.9 +/- 1.5yrs; Height 172.5+/- 8.6cm; Weight 81.4+/- 21.0kg). The athletes were distributed across weight classes for collegiate PL (47.6kg: 1; 51.7kg: 1; 54.9kg: 1; 59.8kg: 3; 67.1kg: 2; 74.8kg: 7; 82.1kg: 4; 89.8kg: 9; 99.8kg: 5; SHW: 3). A survey containing questions about powerlifting performance history and the 15-item Sport Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT) were administered to the participants prior to competing. The SCAT total was negatively correlated (r = -.397, p = 0.02) to the athletes' percentage of best total achieved in the competition (Actual Performance Total/Best Comp Total *100). Of the individual lifts, the SCAT score was negatively correlated to the personal best for bench press (r = -0.368, p = 0.03) and deadlift (r = -.317, p = 0.05), but did not significantly correlate for squat (r = -0.182, p = 0.27). These results indicate a negative correlation between SCAT score and athletes' personal best total in PL. Increased SCAT scores were associated with decreased personal best PL totals. The results suggest competitive trait anxiety may have negatively impacted performance and suggests some PL athletes may benefit from interventions aimed at decreasing anxiety prior to and during performance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Researcher 8 6%
Lecturer 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 63 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 27%
Psychology 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 64 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#10,602,391
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#4,240
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,691
of 338,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#69
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.