Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis
Cancer control outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) remain inadequately addressed over intermediate-term (≥5-year) follow-up. We examined biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS), clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in a multi-institutional cohort of men undergoing RARP for localized PCa.
A total of 5670 PCa patients undergoing RARP ± pelvic lymph node dissection as primary treatment modality at three tertiary care centers between 2001 and 2010 were analyzed. BCRFS, CRFS, and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model tested their association with available preoperative and postoperative parameters.
43.6 and 15.1 % of patients had D'Amico intermediate- and high-risk disease, respectively. Over a mean (median) follow-up of 56 (50.4) months, 797 men had a BCR, 78 men had CR, and 32 men died of PCa. Actuarial BCRFS, CRFS, and CSS, respectively, were 83.3, 98.6, and 99.5 % at 5-year; 76.5, 97.5, and 98.7 % at 8-year; and 73.3, 96.7, and 98.4 % at 10-year follow-ups. Only 1.7 % of patients received any adjuvant treatment. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy Gleason score (GS) were independent clinical predictors of BCRFS, CRFS, and CSS, while postoperatively positive surgical margin, pathological GS, pathological stage, and lymph node invasion were significantly associated with BCR and CR (all p < 0.05).
Cancer control outcomes of RARP appear comparable to those reported for open and laparoscopic RP in previous literature, despite low overall rate of adjuvant treatment. Disease severity and preoperative PSA may aid in risk prognostication and defining postoperative follow-up protocols.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,359,595
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#1,482
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,164
of 400,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
