↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a cervicometer compared to transvaginal ultrasound in identifying women with a short cervical length: a multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessment of a cervicometer compared to transvaginal ultrasound in identifying women with a short cervical length: a multicenter study
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.029
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Preterm birth remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Short cervical length as measured by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester represents the single most predictive risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth. Previous studies have addressed, in part, the limitations of transvaginal ultrasound availability by utilizing a cervicometer to screen patients for short cervix, identifying those patients who may not benefit from transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening. In view of the prior studies indicating that a cervicometer measurement may have a high negative predictive value for a sonographically short cervix, we sought to identify the ideal cervicometer threshold value in a prospective, multicenter study. The primary objective was to determine the cervicometer cervical length measurement threshold that provides a high negative predictive value for the identification of patients who are highly unlikely to have a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement <20 and <25 mm and, therefore, may forego transvaginal ultrasound. This prospective study, executed in 5 US centers, included 401 women ≥ 18 years of age who provided written informed consent to undergo cervical length measurement in the mid trimester. All women underwent both cervicometer and transvaginal ultrasound measured cervical lengths by individuals blinded to results of the other measurement. Both measurements were performed at 17-23 weeks' gestation (Visit 1) and repeated at 24-29 weeks' gestation (Visit 2). All transvaginal ultrasound measurement images were reviewed by a central reader. Test characteristics and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to determine and confirm the optimal cervicometer cervical length threshold, maximizing the negative predictive value. Three hundred fifty eight subjects were evaluable at Visit 1 and 267 at Visit 2. At Visit 1, the average transvaginal ultrasound cervical length was 38.7± 7.6 mm and the average cervicometer cervical length was 30.3 ± 8.8 mm. Similar measurements were seen at Visit 2. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to graphically identify a cervicometer cervical length threshold of 30 mm that maximized sensitivity while minimizing the false positive rate. The 30 mm cervicometer cervical length threshold provided a 98-100% negative predictive value and 0.0 negative likelihood ratio for identification of women who have a low likelihood to have a sonographic short cervix (i.e., transvaginal cervical length <20 mm or <25 mm). The 17-23 weeks' gestation 30 mm cervicometer cervical length threshold has 100% sensitivity, 45-46% specificity, and 1.8 and 0.0 positive and negative likelihood ratios to predict sonographic cervical length ≤20 and ≤25 mm. Cervicometer cervical length screening successfully identifies women at low risk for short transvaginal cervical length. Use of a 30 mm threshold by cervicometer cervical length measurement confers a 98-100% negative predictive value, with high sensitivity and moderate specificity to predict a transvaginal ultrasound short cervical length. Cervicometer measurement of cervical length may permit almost 50% of women to avoid transvaginal ultrasound.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Philosophy 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#10,659,219
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#8,768
of 17,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,393
of 335,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#115
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.