You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dating the upper Cenozoic sediments in Fisher Valley, southeastern Utah
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1130/0016-7606(1986)97<1422:dtucsi>2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
STEVEN M. COLMAN, ANNE F. CHOQUETTE, JOHN N. ROSHOLT, GIFFORD H. MILLER, D. J. HUNTLEY |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 71% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2010.
All research outputs
#4,562,827
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#872
of 2,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,556
of 42,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.